Monday, August 20, 2012

MMGM: Two Young Sherlocks

I have a confession to make: I have not actually read Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. (Well, I read the first part of A Study in Scarlet, and then got completely bored when the scene suddenly shifted to America, so put it down and never went back.)

 But I love Sherlock Holmes! At least, I love all his various incarnations, interpreted by various writers, directors and actors. (Yes, I'm talking about Benedict Cumberbatch again, don't shoot me!)

 You would think my enthusiasm for all things Holmesian would send me back to the originals, and I'm sure I will eventually get over my mental block and pick up The Sign of Four. But I happened to be browsing the kids' section of the library for books with maple leaves on the spines (since I haven't yet done my Canadian book for August), and look what I found:


Not one, but two different series about Sherlock Holmes as a boy.








Who was the young man who turned into the brilliant, enigmatic detective? Was he always that clever and observant (and obnoxious)? How did he become an excellent boxer and violinist? Why is he so friendly with street urchins? Well, Andrew Lane and Shane Peacock set their imaginations to answering all these questions, and came up with two very different but equally plausible young versions of the sleuth.

Death Cloud, the first of Andrew Lane's Young Sherlock Holmes mysteries, has a Sherlock from an upper class, though not terribly wealthy family. His father is away in the military, and his mother is unwell, so older brother Mycroft, already working for the British Government, arranges for Sherlock to spend summer vacation with an aunt and uncle in the small town of Farnham. Mycroft also engages an American tutor with unconventional teaching methods. A couple of bizarre deaths in Farnham lead Sherlock to discover a criminal conspiracy endangering the entire country. He has some help from the tutor and his pretty daughter, and more help from Matt, an orphan living on his own. His investigations put him in danger of his life, repeatedly--curiosity and fearlessness are this Sherlock's primary traits, and he uses the logic and observational skills he has learned from Mycroft and his tutor to put the pieces of the conspiracy together and single-handedly defeat it.

Eye of the Crow is the 1st Case of Shane Peacock's The Boy Sherlock Holmes. This is the book with the maple leaf on the spine, since Peacock is a Canadian. His Sherlock is a more complex character from a much bleaker background. His mother is a gentlewoman who fell in love with a poor Jew and was disowned for marrying him. The family lives in extreme poverty in a terrible neighborhood in London, and Sherlock resents it greatly. He plays truant regularly, preferring to observe humanity in Trafalger Square and read the sensational happenings in the Illustrated Police News. Sherlock is regularly harassed by a young thief who calls himself Malefactor and his gang of street kids called the Irregulars. The case that gets Sherlock's sleuthing attention is a woman knifed to death in an alleyway, and he is driven to find out what happened when the police arrest a young Arab man who claims to be innocent. But Sherlock's investigations lead Lestrade (the elder: his son who wants to be a detective has a brief appearance) to arrest him on suspicion of working with the Arab. Sherlock escapes the Bow Street jail with the help of a beautiful girl named Irene Doyle, and has to find the real killer to prove his own innocence as well as the Arab's. He enters an uneasy partnership with Malefactor, and learns how to disguise himself and ask the right people the right questions. But the murderer will do anything to prevent Sherlock from collecting the evidence he needs.

Both novels are full of excitment: escapes, fights, spying, mysterious figures in the shadows. Both mysteries are interesting and require lots of observation and deduction to solve. Readers familiar with the Sherlock stories will recognize certain elements in each novel, which is fun. Eye of the Crow is the darker of the two books, and probably the one closer to the canon in terms of setting, psychology, and characters who will appear later. But both books are great reads and will satisfy the Holmes afficionado--or will ignite afficion in readers who haven't yet caught the Baker St. bug.

This post is a two-for-one in multiple dimensions: it's my Marvelous Middle Grade Monday offering, and my Canadian Book Challenge book for August. Find marvelous middle-grade books every Monday on Shannon Messenger's great siteand find great Canadian books to read on John Mutford's awesome blog.





13 comments:

  1. Both of these books sound interesting. I like that they are so different- so they can both be read and enjoyed. I also like that there are little clues that big fans can pick up along the way. Thanks for sharing.
    ~Jess

    ReplyDelete
  2. Going back to the first paragraph (haven't read the new books in question), that -- the part where Study in Scarlet randomly leaves Watson's narration and hangs out in an odd version of the American Old West for awhile-- is exactly where I got distracted and put it down without noticing that my volume had The Sign of Four right in it afterward, AND, with all the more recent Holmesy things out, I DID go back, see that, and read Sign of Four and I LOVE Sign of Four-- it's probably my favorite Holmes I've read-- so do, go read it! It's wonderful because Watson gets a romantic subplot, which I love not only because I'm sweet on Watson but also because it makes the dynamic between them funnier, like you can almost sense Watson's playing up his romantic feelings just because it will DRIVE HOLMES NUTS when he reads it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Lane has done a little better than the Peacock for me-- the only thing I don't like is the Justin Bieber-like American covers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, too funny: my edition was the one with the circle in the middle, so I had to look up the Justin Bieber one!

      I can see that younger readers would prefer the Lane version: it's more straightforward adventure.

      Delete
  4. They sound intriguing! I haven't heard of either and haven't done much Sherlock Holmes reading at all.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've only read Baskerville and League of the Red-headed Men of original Doyle's. However I have read all of Laurie R. King's Sherlock Holmes/Mary Russell books and highly recommend them. Especially the first two: Beekeeper's Apprentice and Monstrous Regiment of Women. (Sort of a two-parter in some ways.)

    I don't care for procedural mysteries much, no matter how well written, I'm afraid. I need to care about the characters and Doyle doesn't make me care about Holmes or Watson very much. King makes me care a lot.

    Might look into these -- I've enjoyed your recommendations in the past.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Interesting post... I am not familiar with any Sherlock Holmes realated works, but of these two I think Death Cloud catches my attention more. Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is certainly a different MMGM entry! Very informative, Kim. I've seen the Lane book in the bookstore (with the Justin Bieber lookalike!), but not the Peacock one. I will keep them in mind. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm a big Sherlock (& Doyle) fan and just love Peacock's vision of the boy Sherlock. He grows throughout the books also more and more becoming the man we know as Sherlock Holmes. Great series! I've never hear of the other.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do feel that Peacock's version is closer to Doyle's: I can see him becoming more of a loner, more obsessed and eccentric--he's more of a tormented soul.

      Delete
  9. neat - i haven't read either. but i love sherlock, no matter what form. curious to see how lucy lui does as watson in the upcoming tv show.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes . . . being a big fan of the BBC version, I'm skeptical about how the Americans are going to interpret the characters. Skeptical, but open-minded!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Awesome post, Kim! I've never read Sir Arthur Conan Doyle either, but man, isn't Sherlock popular? Me and my sister both loooove detective stories - actually addicted to them. We love watching detectives in action, but we're not that into reading them. Well, I never really read any detective stories so I can't know if I like them or not. But maybe one of these days, I'll finally be able to read Sherlock Holmes and other detective stories. ;)

    ReplyDelete